To: El Gato
You obviously did not look at the cutaway, the laser fills the 747, it wouldn't even fit on a 707 airframe, let alone leave any rooms for the stuff already on the AWACS. This is a prototype. Once they get it working better, they will figure out how to make it more compact.
And rather than make it fit in a 707 airframe, I was thinking more of having an AWACS radar attached to a more modern plane ( the cancelled E-10 was supposed to be based on a 767, but they might see about using a 747 as the base for a merged AWACS/laser system)
51 posted on
03/06/2012 4:29:40 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
To: PapaBear3625
And rather than make it fit in a 707 airframe, I was thinking more of having an AWACS radar attached to a more modern plane ( the cancelled E-10 was supposed to be based on a 767, but they might see about using a 747 as the base for a merged AWACS/laser system) I once worked on a proposal for a new AWACs, it would have had a 3 sided AESA (Active Electronically Steerable Array) radar, a lot more power and gain, and thus detection range,than the current AWACs (needed for stealthy targets), and based on a 747 airframe. It still would have taken up most of the aircraft.
Besides the mission profiles are unlikely to be compatible.
52 posted on
03/11/2012 11:25:42 PM PDT by
El Gato
("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson