Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: U-238
....perhaps twice as many by 2025. But even then, the Chinese force will be small compared with that of Russia and the United States.

We need to keep in mind, China has what is commonly referred to as a "deterrent" force. Russia and the US have what is commonly referred to as a "MAD" force, (Mutally Assured Destruction). I've read estimates between 800-1500 ICBM's, each, vs China's, maybe 50 or so. And double that amount by 2025. Which would still put them at significantly less than either the US or Russia.

I find it ironic, that the American public, no longer fears Russia's capability, but seem to focus on China's. But I personally fear Russia more and feel Russia would more likely use weapons of mass destruction than the Chinese.

It only makes sense, that Russia would likely use her force long before China. China has a growing conventional force. China is more plugged into the global economy and more dependent than Russia for global resources. And China's financial system is slowly integrating into the West. There is no need for China to resort to nuclear force, but only as an absolute last resort.

Russia on the other hand, is a super power based soley on her nuclear arsenel. That is her ace in the hole.

So, once again, I do find it ironic that few seem to fear Russia.

21 posted on 03/05/2012 11:37:16 AM PST by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ponder life

I agree with your thesis. Russia is still a danger.


22 posted on 03/05/2012 4:00:36 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson