Your theory about the completely fraudulent BC (yes, that’s what it is Bunky) seems to be that since a few of the observations are incorrect, all of the other facts must be disgarded. Ridiculous. I always wonder what draws people here who claim to simply want to point out the “real” issues are being ignored. They are not. But neither am I going to ignore a self-evidently false document that probably is offering cover for a faux President. I can chew gum and walk at the same time, but thanks for worrying needlessly.
What facts are there that it is fake? Is there anything but some graphical artifacts that can more easily be explained by actually using the software? Please tell.