Did he actually say she is a slut or was it an analogy that actually determined, yes she’s a slut?
This is so very well said. Don’t forget that Obama also called Tea Party people “tea baggers.” Any apologies there? Nope. What you are witnessing is the collapse of the state controlled media. It is so obvious to the public that these double standards abound. The MSM has no credibility.
Wait. Rules only apply to the Right? NO WAY!!!!
What will Rush do on Monday? I’m thinking this is shaping up to be a golden opportunity.
What Rush should have have said ‘’I’m sorry the woman is a slut’’.
My only disagreement with Rush Limbaugh is his apology. What he said was right on. We have too damned many of these little weasels, male and female, who day-by-day and hour-by-hour seek to destroy the fabric of our society and who are largely succeeding. Enough is enough and Limbaugh should stick by his guns.
As for Kirsten Powers, I see little glimmers from time to time that she is testing the conservative waters. Heavy emphasis on the "little glimmers."
I don’t usually agree with Kirsten, but she is right on this, no one confronts the left when they call names . . . just the right. And when you call them on it, they just get angry and nasty.
Really tired of him trying to make a virtue out of backing down. Use it or lose us. |
What about James "Drag a hundred- dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find" Carville?
How about Democrats in general who think women as a class are so stupid they cannot take care of themselves without government assistance and cradle-to-grave care? There is no more insulting misogynistic behavior than that.
Wow. Kirsten Powers wrote this?
Sounds like she's on the edge of the sort of epiphany that launched Andrew Breitbart on his journey towards Conservatism.
It remains to be seen how fast and how far back Kristen walks this but, nevertheless, this is the sort of introspection that causes one to turn away from The Dark Side.
If the advertisers of The Daily Beast aren't badgered into calling for her head on a silver platter first.
See how I did that? She began her rant with a Biblical allusion to "shout from the rooftops" and I ended mine with a Biblical nod towards the calling for one's head on a silver platter for deigning to speak such insolence to men of power no matter how true.
Since when do I have a moral imperative to support someone’s bedroom activities ?
I’m actually a little envious about how often she apparently gets laid.
I do wonder, is she that good in bed that her many suitors make sure she is pleasured as much as she requires to keep her happy?
How does she find the time to make herself a available so often?
I suspect if she is getting laid so often it is more business than pleasure
If her product is so good and in such high demand it ought to be self sustaining and shouldn’t require a subsidy from me or any other person who pays taxes.
Is she to big to fail?
Or just plain hornier than anyone?
Hey Kaslin!!
Anyway: I wrote Rush like this:
Good he apologized... didn’t sound right....
BUT
Where have women come to where this law student can’t even get a guy to pony up for the price of her contraception?!
She (women in general) take all the risks, and even if you’re OK with abortion, it still is a dangerous, invasive procedure.... that only the woman is in a position to have done...
She probably splits dinner 50/50, pays for all the prophylactic devices.... Soon she’ll be paying for the fellow’s services too!
I think that Rush should have told the girl to ask a prostitute for ADVICE in SELF RESPECT!
If a woman can put her proclivities for her bedroom out and gives us a number that she demands we support, why is it we can’t take that number as an insult, while quantifying what that number represents?
This a business for her and society has a name for that business which really shouldn’t be any of mine.
[ Without it, the fight against media misogyny will continue to be perceived as a proxy war for the Democratic Party ]
Because with few exceptions, Kirsten, that’s what it is. When will you admit that to yourself and see the left for what it really is? Atleast Rush focused his comments at woman who insists on going in front of Congress to discuss her sex life and demand the power of Gov’t be used to force others to provide contraceptions to her for free. All so she can be free of responsibilty and consequence, and even if others have violate their conscience and abandon their religious beliefs.
Fluke claims that she spent $1,000 per year on condoms, $3,000 over a period of three years.
Let’s do the math.
At CVS there are 55 different condom products and I’ve selected the following one since she claims that she’s a girl that just wants to have fun.
Durex Pack of Condoms. Includes Case, 3 Vibrating Rings and 48 Condoms (Assorted Flavors and Colors). Protects Against Pregnancy, HIV-AIDS and STDs when used as directed. Electronically tested for reliability. Made of Latex.
So for $1,000 per year she would get 50 of these packs, which would mean that she could have protected sex 2,400 times per year, which computes to 52 times per week, every week, with no time off, and means that she’s having sex 7.5 times a day.
When does she have time to go to class, agitate her causes, testify in front of a mock committee headed by Pelosi,take sympathy calls from Barry?
If indeed she is able to be this sexually active I shudder to see what her visits to her gynecologist cost.I assume that Georgetown covers those.
It is time he stopped blowing his own horn and got back to doing what he does best.