Then you take the 1990 position letter WRITTEN FOR THAT RUN FOR CONGRESS that he wrote trying to soften his previous pro-abortion life, and you cut off the statement to leave off the part about pregnancy being a problem for women.
Here is that portion of his new campaign position for that race. "Abortion is such a deeply wrenching issue because it poses a conflict between essential values. The unborn child's very life is at stake; the mother's future often hangs in the balance too, as an unwanted pregnancy can be unspeakably traumatic as well as limiting her educational, personal, and job opportunities"
Once again:
Abortion is such a deeply wrenching issue because it poses a conflict between essential values. The unborn childs very life is at stake;
He confirms the humanity of the unborn. Any objective analysis of this passage must include this portion.
And you conveniently ignore the part where he says that abortion kills an unborn child.
Hey - you cited the source without citing his statement. I cited his statement from your source, that proves you are wrong.