Finally? You mean just like the other times I posted that to you on this thread?
To: LeopoldvonRanke
This is bizarre, you are totally ignoring his own, firm, statement, “I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress,” he said..
Then you take the 1990 position letter WRITTEN FOR THAT RUN FOR CONGRESS that he wrote trying to soften his previous pro-abortion life, and you cut off the statement to leave off the part about pregnancy being a problem for women.
Here is that portion of his new campaign position for that race. “Abortion is such a deeply wrenching issue because it poses a conflict between essential values. The unborn child’s very life is at stake; the mother’s future often hangs in the balance too, as an unwanted pregnancy can be unspeakably traumatic as well as limiting her educational, personal, and job opportunities”
90 posted on Sat Mar 03 2012 22:07:29 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by ansel12
“This is bizarre, you are totally ignoring his own, firm, statement”
Not so. I want to see something he put on paper, something that he wrote down explaining his position. Like was done for him in 1990 where he clearly wrote his support for the unborn.
This is the exact same evidentiary standard and would provide proof for your claim that he was in fact pro choice.