Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

That is what you are doing right now. Posting everything else but that over and over again.

Perhaps you hope that by continually posting his statement minus the affirmation of prolife principles you can make it stick.

Good luck with that, btw. :)

I’m greatly heartened that this is the source of your allegations. I thought it might be something substantive, but I see that’s not the case here.


118 posted on 03/04/2012 9:59:50 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: LeopoldvonRanke

I know that you have only been posting here for about 10 days, and that you are probably a retread, but you seem to be insane.

Did you read post 90 and post 114 where I quoted that portion of the 1990 switch that you keep saying I haven’t quoted?

“Abortion is such a deeply wrenching issue because it poses a conflict between essential values. The unborn child’s very life is at stake; the mother’s future often hangs in the balance too, as an unwanted pregnancy can be unspeakably traumatic as well as limiting her educational, personal, and job opportunities”

Now explain why you keep pretending that Santorum has not told us that he was pro-abortion for his entire life before he switched to run that 1990 campaign.

“I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress,” he said HE RAN FOR CONGRESS IN 1990, THAT IS THE CHANGE, THE SWITCH.


120 posted on 03/04/2012 10:07:39 AM PST by ansel12 (Rick Santorum, Catholic, “I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress,” he sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson