I think "Vin" can speak for himself.
It wasn't a spam, it was an adroitly researched, factual, verified expose of Sanctimonium's corruption, and violation of the Establishment Clause. And you still haven't answered my question: Isn't it a little difficult to apply the adjective "principled" to someone who does something like this?
I sent this to a lot of hardline Santorum supporters, who read and considered it, and told me it made them wonder how much else they didn't know about Rick. And they were open to hearing and reading more about Newt and Santorum. Of course, these were thoughtful people, who had reasoning and thought processes I could appeal to by having respect for their intellect and character. I can see why you didn't choose to read it, or answer my question, except with your usual snideness. You seem to approve of Rick's actions, and that at least is good to know.
It’s a multi-page constructed item that you have posted to 4 threads in the past 3 days, and which you posted in THIS thread, which was about a state co-chair in the Gingrich campaign quitting and supporting Santorum — which means the post wasn’t on the topic of the thread.
That is the definition of Spam.
I ignored your question because it has nothing to do with the thread, or anything I have said on this thread, and I don’t generally answer random off-topic questions, no matter how rudely people insist I owe them responses.
If you want to provide a service, set up your spams on a nice page, and provide links to them for people.
If you want to provide more of a service, try talking about the topic of a thread, not just posting what interests you more. If you really like your own words, post a vanity, and then people can decide if they want to bother reading it or not.
As you mention, Vin can speak for himself, and certainly doesn’t need YOU posting that he can speak for himself — he could do it himself, as you said, and I did ping him to my comment.