Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

25% of the cost was for pollution controls - amazing.
1 posted on 03/03/2012 2:20:39 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blueplum

20%


2 posted on 03/03/2012 2:42:59 AM PST by TweetEBird007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Interesting post.

I had no idea new USA coal plants were being constructed.

All I read about is old plants being shut down, and permits for new plants being denied.


4 posted on 03/03/2012 3:09:12 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

But-but-but....it still produces CARBON DIOXIDE!!

Won’t that make most of southern Illinois burst into a huge sheet of flame? And won’t the flame burn all the way to the little children playing in playgrounds and back yards?

(Oh, dammit, do I STILL have to use the “sarcasm” tag?)


5 posted on 03/03/2012 3:10:43 AM PST by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Illinois??? coincidence?
8 posted on 03/03/2012 3:31:53 AM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

“25% of the cost was for pollution controls - amazing. “

Actually more than that. The entire plant is designed around controlling pollution, due to the many old laws. This extra billion dollars was just for the new crap from the EPA.


9 posted on 03/03/2012 3:54:39 AM PST by BobL (I don't care about his past - Santorum will BRING THE FIGHT to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Sounds a lot like the cost of your new car.


12 posted on 03/03/2012 5:03:44 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Illinois bituminous coal is high in sulfur and is usually not the fuel of choice. Western low-sulfur subbituminous coals are preferred, but, as the article points out, they require huge transportation costs. This is the biggest new "greenfield mine-mouth" coal-fired plant built in the US in the last 20 years.

It doesn't sound like the plant has mercury scrubbers -- rather surprising.

How in the world did Obama not get around to bankrupting this project and Peabody coal? That's another campaign promise broken.

Video of the plant on Bechtel's website at www.bechtel.com. Just look at all the construction workers building the plant! Real jobs, not bogus "green jobs."

14 posted on 03/03/2012 7:10:20 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
The Department of Energy sees coal remaining the dominant source of power for electricity generation for decades, even though it predicts that its use will drop from 45%...

The DOE has amazing powers of prognostication!

Just look at their long list of successful selections!

The ROI,oh it's good to be king!

16 posted on 03/03/2012 7:22:42 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

I spent five years starting up power plants like this world-wide. It is great to see American can-do is still alive when the damn government finally gets accommodated enough to step aside and let things get built.

Note construction crew cars and trucks in foreground parking lot!!


17 posted on 03/03/2012 7:32:22 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Lively Grove, Illinois about half way between Carbondale & St. Louis.


21 posted on 03/03/2012 10:48:41 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson