Posted on 03/02/2012 7:23:06 PM PST by MetaThought
Did you just ping me to my own topic? lol
In my experience, women want a confident guy they can’t break.
***So 95% of the women out there proceed to attempt to break their guy. Great set up.
You must be an asshole
“Even in Darwinist terms, sexual success ought to be measured by the number of offspring you have, not by the number of partners.”
Good point, for example, all that promiscuity results in a lot of disease and messed up/fatherless/abandoned kids.
Chicks dig jerks and deny that they do!
Nice guys are confusing to a woman’s ego. The nice guy treats her extremely well but because he is a nice guy he treats everyone extremely well. Woman observes this and her not getting “special” treatment eventually burns through her dopamine load and she jettisons Mr Nice. In comes Mr Ahole and he treats everyone like garbage except for his woman. Her “I am Special” meter kicks in with it ability to keep the dopamine flowing.
Women love nice guys, they go apeshite over Aholes.
“Unfortunately, my heart hurt was hurt too many times as I witnessed prior “nice” girls hook up with such lowlifes.”
Don’t feel bad; at this point they’ll hook up with whoever may be stupid enough to knock ‘em up (”marriage” isn’t even on the table - it has already been successfully destroyed by the left. Look around if you don’t believe that.)
The old school counted offspring (which even our permanent underclass could belch out); now they know it is VIABLE GRANDCHILDREN that measure Darwinian “fitness” (this eliminates welfare queens from the equation).
Once the ants were feeding the grasshoppers’ children, they realized they had to adjust the formula...
See # 29
” Civilization is the triumph of nice guys over the jerks.”
Exactly. Prior to civilization, rape and looting were the best strategies to get ahead in life. Civilization rests on the willingness of third parties to bear the burden of suppressing such behavior, allowing more benign and productive life strategies to have a chance.
Alabama tax $$$ at work, again.
True. But a pretty good description of the hero of most modern romance novels, at least in the early stage of their relationship, before she "tames" him.
The Comments for this article pretty much proves the author's point. Many people violently reject the findings of research in this area. They don't show where the research is inaccurate, they just dislike the results.
Famous underground cartoonist Robert Crumb (keep on truckin’) had a huge rant about this subject in one of his comic books. Crumb was a self-described skinny nerd who no matter how good his artistic talents, was always being brushed aside for the obnoxious, strutting tough guys who treated their women awful. He was contemptuous of females who publicly stated they wanted a tender, understanding male, but constantly went for the insensitive cruds. But then Crumb became famous, and everything changed for him. Then he began treating women like disposable sex objects.
“...sexual success, defined in the literature as a larger number of total lifetime sexual partners.”
-
An odd definition.
Consequences and outcomes in a person’s body and mind and their lives define success differently, too.
Americans define success as whatever the elite say it is in the pop culture and education. Today, heterosexual relationships, honor and dignity is looked down upon while being a caculating psychopath and pervert is “success.”
LOL My bad. It was late.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.