To: Toespi
.
I have a "nurturing" Theory about Rush's "slut" remarks ...
First, of course, he's correct ... any Woman in any office, bar, church, etc ... who said that she needs $ 3,000 annually to supoort her (unmarried) sexual addiction ...
is accurately called a "slut" ...
However ... there's a chance that Rush deliberately brought the "gasoline AND the matches" and escalated this to a Nuclear DefCon-1 level ...
WHY ?
Perhaps to take the National attention from the Super Tuesday primaries ... Newt's possible strategic gains ... Santorum's lost status ... and Romney's embarrassment ...
After all ... Super Tuesday is already "page six" news for the next week ...
"Just a theory ... that happens to fit the facts ..."
Spock, Star Trek VI, "The Undiscovered Country" ...
.
65 posted on
03/02/2012 6:42:46 PM PST by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
To: Patton@Bastogne
Who does this benefit, Santorum?
66 posted on
03/02/2012 6:52:49 PM PST by
Toespi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson