Let’s say Ms. Fluke is celibate, pure as the driven snow, and on birth control pills “just in case”.
She would still be way out of line demanding that a Jesuit institution change it’s core beliefs and likewise demanding that everybody else foot the bill.
Rush could have made his point without resorting to that language, and I really wish he had. Now the argument is all about the label, and not about the substance of the discussion.
You have a point, but only because we on the right have allowed the left to define our language and our battlefield.
Actually it is about the “label”. The “label” is the lifestyle she is asking the US taxpayers to subsidize. She is the “label’s” poster child and is trying to destroy one of our core constitutionally protected rights. She deserves every bit of vitriol.