[kidd]

I dunno.

She’s a 30 year old democrat activist, pretending to be a normal college student. She participates in a fake democrat hearing, meant to support the democrat attack on religious freedom. She overstates the cost of contraception by a factor of ten as a lie that there really is a need for this in the first place.

The issue isn’t really about her sexual practices. But it is about selling herself out to support the latest cause of the democrat party.

Would it be ok to label her a democrat-whore, rather than a sexual-whore?

[rockvillem]

The issue isn’t really about her sexual practices. But it is about selling herself out to support the latest cause of the democrat party. Would it be ok to label her a democrat-whore, rather than a sexual-whore?

Bingo! I posted a somewhat similar thought upthread, but you've hit it a different way. She has sold out to help the leftist cause. This is pure political theater that really has little to do with her actual sexual practices but everything to do with her political practices. The focus on her sex life is misdirection by Team Obama.

[HangingTuff]

Absolutely right.