My schtick is not taking talk radion nutburgers and internet conspiricy kooks seriously. It's worked well.
It's not working so well when you rush to judgement. Yours was not an accurate description of Savage's Thursday show, Did you listen to it in it's entirety or just fire off a knee jerk reaction to someone else's comment about it?
Simply entertaining a reasonable question is not the same as running full speed ahead without facts. Here are a couple of facts. Breitbart, two or three weeks ago, threatened to expose heretofore unseen videos from Obama's college years prior to the election; videos that purportedly show hard evidence of Obama's intention to use racial division and class warfare to radically alter this country's soul. Two days ago, Breitbart dropped dead on the street. He had an event with his heart a year ago. Yes, the most likely scenario looks like a heart attack.
But, there is much at stake. The left is ensconced, like they've never been before, in a position to remake this country into their regressive fantasy. There are nefarious people around who will stop at nothing to get what they want and people have died at convenient times before. It's a tad unusual for a 43 year old man to drop dead in his tracks. Where's the harm in entertaining the obvious question within the scope of known facts?
Do conservatives have to be unimaginative dullards? Andrew Breitbart certainly wasn't and I don't think he, by default, would have left the questions unasked.