Posted on 03/01/2012 9:41:53 PM PST by grundle
For example, the article has a section called "Wall St. Reform," but the liberal consensus that controls the article will not allow it to mention that Obama was actually the #1 recipient of Wall St. donations over the past 20 years.
As another example, the article has a section called "Transparency" which mentions all sorts of wonderful promises that Obama has made, but does not mention his major violations of transparency, or that many of his promises were actually broken.
Wikipedia is like a Goebbel’s version of the Truth. It doesn’t surprise me. I have noticed their extreme bias before. It is a Leftist tool for disinformation.
Good work. Here is my anti Obama blog: http://obamaclarifier.blogspot.com/
I am much more interested in his past before 2008. How about his activities, interests, and grades. What was he doing in 2000? The later years were just preparation for political office - I want to know why he was doing this and who were his backers.
You should send your information to the Gingrich campaign.
Bookmark a great reference list
Why all the “[[GARBAGE]]” that makes that post nearly impossible to read? What were you trying to do?
Yeah, so he’s violated the Constitution several times. Each time someone makes a little noise and the noise dies down. Which eggs 0bambi on to violate it again.
This is all Kabuki theater while this despicable swearer of false oaths continues to steal our liberties.
“Treason doth never prosper; what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” Sir John Harrington
“The only thing needed for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke
I posted your article here:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread815100/pg1
However, I can only post the allotted 3 paragraphs there as that is the ATS policy.
As the author, you could post all of it if you are a member there.
I would like to see all of it there as that is a much more liberal venue than the
PREACHING TO THE CHOIR context of FR.
Please consider posting the whole article there.
EXCELLENT AND WELL DONE, BTW.
THX BIG.
BTW, giving stars and flags can help attract readers there.
This word—the facts you present so well in your article—need spread as far and wide as possible, imho.
ping for later
ping for re-formatting
...with 6 Social Security numbers you don’t have to do a lot..
ping
!
Bookmarked this good work.
I’d also like to know who and why he was groomed. Not that we’re likely to learn this in our lifetimes.
. . . and the release of the late Andrew Breitbart’s tapes will prove ‘Bummer is a nob-gobbler.
Excellent article. Glad you posted it.
That's the format for putting the information into wikipedia articles.
Thanks. Everyone has my permission to copy 100% of that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.