Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

Wasn’t this called the “Anti-dog-eat-dog bill” in the book?


26 posted on 03/01/2012 4:07:32 PM PST by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ponygirl
Nope. Anti-dog prevented one company from taking over another in the same or a related industry. Anti-dog is why Rearden had to cancel his option on and intended purpose of buying Fleming's copper property.

This piece of crap is more along the lines of the "Railroad Unification Bill", except that it doesn't have the goobermint setting **prices** directly, only profits. "Only" profits. As if there's any significant distinction over the medium term, eh? Sheesh.

33 posted on 03/01/2012 4:20:39 PM PST by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson