You haven't stated any.
You obviously don't know the first thing about logic either. You stated no facts. You made gratuitous assertions, and according to the rules of logic a gratuitous assertion may be just as gratuitously denied.
The fact you totally misunderstood what the term "incidental" was being applied to is just "icing on the cake."
So now I'm just going to rhetorically beat on you because "stupid should hurt," and you are too proud to concede and too lazy to educate yourself.