He’s not exciting. He doesn’t connect with the audience. Unless the audience is a group of elites like himself. He has no common touch. He does not understand conservative principles and offers liberal ideas with a conservative spin. Every single time he opens his mouth lies fly out.
Newt is a way better speaker than Mittens. Newt not only understands, but he can explain conservative principles in easily understandable terms. He can, as Mitt cannot, provide plenty of red meat for the base. Mr. Mayonnaise on White bread cannot excite anyone because there is no red meat in him.
How you can possibly think that Romney is the best speech maker I cannot imagine. Unless you happen to be one of his elite pals.
I dont think you listened to Romney’s or Newt’s speeches last night.
IF you watched then you saw Newt meander for 15 full minutes of nonsense and completely squandered the fact he was the first candidate up on a big night and addressing a national audience.
Then IF you watched Romney speak you saw him give out tons of “red meat” lines to a cheering audience. Now, you cover your comment on speech giving by adding that Romeny is lying every time he opens his mouth. OK that’s fine.
The above are simple facts. Don’t you know I wanted to see Newt give a great speech? He didn’t. Nor was this the first time Newt disappointed, in fact he chose to give that bizarre news conference after the Nevada caucuses, so he squandered the last chance he had to give a good speech on a primary night.
If Newt becomes the front runner again, he has my vote. So does Rick. Whatever happens I am going to vote GOP and against that lying miserable leftist disaster BHO.