Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

But it was not the Constitution that decided this. Father Drinan’s religious superiors were uncomfortable with him in Congress. It probably had more to do with Drinan voting against Catholic doctrine on some social issues than anything else. If I remember correctly Drinan was to the Left of Che Guevara.


86 posted on 02/28/2012 11:03:52 PM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: gusty
No you are correct. The Constitution is mute on the subject so theoretically a cardinal could be President. I think Garfield was a licensed minister at the time he graduated from college. He didn't pursue a clerical career. I know I have read he presided over religious services while an officer in the Civil War.
88 posted on 02/28/2012 11:09:20 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson