Your point was about serving two masters, not the qualities thereof. So my point was addressing serving two masters - not about which is a better master to serve.
Your argument with Romney is not that he would serve two masters, but with the master he serves - make THAT point, and leave alone the “two masters” red herring.
You are obviously unaware of the book about Romney on this subject, Can Mitt Romney Serve Two Masters?
My point is PRECISELY about serving two masters...or in this case probably serving the LDS instead of the Country or the Constitution.