Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRUDEN: The ignorance of Rick Santorum
The Washington Times ^ | February 28, 2012 | Wesley Pruden

Posted on 02/28/2012 8:14:16 PM PST by Mariner

There’s a tiny priest living in Rick Santorum’s trim, toned body, struggling to get out. The rogue priest escaped Sunday and said foolish things.

The candidate most admired for plain speech made it plain and clear that he doesn’t believe in the wall between church and state and doesn’t think much of John F. Kennedy for saying he did.

“I don’t believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute,” he told ABC News. “The idea that church can have no influence or involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beltwaycrap; corruption; dems4santorum; establishment; idiot; insider; rooster; roosterrick; santorum; twistedlogic; unions4santorum; wespruden; whatanidiot; whatasnob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
I agree with Wes Pruden.

When Santorum said he encouraged a role for the Church in the operation of the state, he disqualified himself from Federal office.

1 posted on 02/28/2012 8:14:19 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Wrong. Separation of Church and State is not constitutional. Santorum knows this. JFK spoke that Protestant pastors shouldn’t tell their congregations how to vote. That statement tells me that JFK did not understand the first amendment.


2 posted on 02/28/2012 8:19:04 PM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Do you really think that the Church shouldn’t have influence over the operation of the state? Do you have any idea what is in the constitution?

The Church should be able to do whatever it wants. The constitution only constrains the state. Churches should be able to use whatever influence they have to shape public policy.


3 posted on 02/28/2012 8:22:17 PM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; All

Yeah; the Kennedy slam (along with a lot of other foolish statements Rick has made “off the cuff”) probably cost him Michigan tonight. I loathe Romney and I like Rick, but every time he starts to speak, I tense up; not knowing what is going to come out of his mouth. When he said the Kennedy speech made him want to throw up, every time he heard it, was the final straw for a lot people. Well..... we still have Newt!


4 posted on 02/28/2012 8:24:10 PM PST by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
I listened to his speech tonight and thought it was exceptional.
5 posted on 02/28/2012 8:27:56 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: impimp
And Rick Santorum said the church should have a role in the operation of the state.

Please address that issue.

6 posted on 02/28/2012 8:31:04 PM PST by Mariner (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: impimp
"Churches should be able to use whatever influence they have to shape public policy."

I agree with that.

But I don't believe a church or the church should have a role in the operation of the state.

Should the run the courts and be the judges? Should they run the public schools?

If so, which church?

7 posted on 02/28/2012 8:34:15 PM PST by Mariner (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Romney won the female vote by 5% and tied the male vote with Santorum.


8 posted on 02/28/2012 8:34:21 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Duh, the founders had church in the capitol building. No one was forced to attend.
9 posted on 02/28/2012 8:36:20 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Pruden's column dates JFK's speech to 1963. That is a slip--the date was 1960, before he was elected.

Santorum's comments remind me of Mark Twain's saying about Wagner's music--"it's not as bad as it sounds." I doubt Santorum really wants to create a theocracy but comments like the ones he made the other day will scare a lot of people.

10 posted on 02/28/2012 8:39:25 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I thought the speech went a long way in addressing the presses cartoon characterization of his attitude towards women. Talking about his working mother, his wife and daughter. I was impressed.
11 posted on 02/28/2012 8:40:49 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

A few weeks back Obama was saying Jesus would raise taxes on ‘the rich’ and was claiming he was doing Jesus work as POTUS.

There was a lot a good material for RS to use against Obama and yet he goes on this diss JFK theme. Lets see, JFK said this 50 YEARS AGO.

Church and state is not the same as beliefs/faith/principles and state.


12 posted on 02/28/2012 8:40:49 PM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"Duh, the founders had church in the capitol building. No one was forced to attend. "

There's not a damn thing wrong with that.

The the institution didn't have a role in the operation of the state.

The men who attended that church DID have an enormous role.

13 posted on 02/28/2012 8:42:27 PM PST by Mariner (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: impimp
Separation of Church and State is not constitutional.

"Strongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Govt in the Constitution of the United States, the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history."

James Madison

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_religions64.html

14 posted on 02/28/2012 8:44:56 PM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
he doesn’t believe in the wall between church and state

There isn't such a thing.

15 posted on 02/28/2012 8:47:02 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Correct, we have a shortage in the men of principle in this government and country today.


16 posted on 02/28/2012 8:49:10 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
"There isn't such a thing. "

“The idea that church can have no influence or involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country.”

"Involvement in the operation of the state"

In fact our Constitution is absolutely clear that only the institutions of the President, Congress, USSC and The States should be "involved in the operation of the state".

17 posted on 02/28/2012 9:01:42 PM PST by Mariner (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

You would think a wordsmith like Pruden would be smart enough not to misuse the term “ignorance” like a bitchy drag queen.

Reading his embellishment of what Santorum *actually said* sounds more like a schoolgirl attempting to destroy a social rival than a competent political analyst.


18 posted on 02/28/2012 9:02:53 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
"Reading his embellishment of what Santorum *actually said* sounds more like a schoolgirl attempting to destroy a social rival than a competent political analyst."

Wes Pruden has his conservative bona fides, far more so than Rick Santorum.

And Rick Santorum's words are worthy of such ridicule. They are the antithesis of our constitutional government.

19 posted on 02/28/2012 9:05:55 PM PST by Mariner (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: impimp

JFK’s remarks on the SCS fallacy were more than abrasive. Santorum obviously wasn’t thinking about the Presidency when he hyperventilated into that brown paper bag. Two dorks.


20 posted on 02/28/2012 9:07:15 PM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson