Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo volente

Since we’re now a net exporter of refined gasoline, I wonder if it’s simply more profitable to ship it where the cost of gasoline to, say, European consumers, is much greater?

I wonder how the average American would react to a dozen refineries suddenly going offline for six months, resulting in the price of gasoline doubling?


55 posted on 02/25/2012 7:45:46 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pox
Since we’re now a net exporter of refined gasoline, I wonder if it’s simply more profitable to ship it where the cost of gasoline to, say, European consumers, is much greater?

We are exporting fuel due to economics. Self-imposed economics.

With demand down, the oil companies have shut down their most inefficient refineries. For the most part, they were in the Northeast.

The result left the Gulf Coast long on refined products, the Northeast short.

Normally, that would be solved by shipping the Gulf Coast's excess production to the Northeast. However, there is no pipeline capacity available to handle the task -- environmentalists having stalled expansion of the pipelines serving this route.

How about shipping it by tanker then? Too expensive. Because US law mandates that all shipments between US ports must be handled by US flag ships and fully unionized crews.

It's actually less expensive to a.) export the excess refined products from the Gulf Coast to Caribbean markets and then b.) provide the Northeast with refined products shipped from Nigeria.

69 posted on 02/25/2012 8:08:47 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson