Posted on 02/25/2012 8:06:20 AM PST by VU4G10
The Horrific Muslim Infestation Of Britain - Luton, 2012 - الإسلام
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
I could only bear to watch about 20 seconds of this. I was boiling.
Stupid Brits. They let it happen...just as the U.S is letting the same thing happen.
"ISLAM ISN'T IN AMERICA TO BE EQUAL TO ANY OTHER FAITH, BUT TO BECOME DOMINANT. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth. Everthing we need to know is in the Koran. We don't need to look somewhere else."
OMAR M. AHMAD, CHAIRMAN OF CAIR, the mainsteam Muslim advocacy group.
personal ping
The Western elite want to defeat Western people. They want to rule; they want Marxism, socialism and ultimately, globalism. Western peoples and their attachments to Western ethics, election choices and debates and liberty, get in the way of totalitarianism. We permit them to divide and conquer us by accepting their race order and anti-white/anti-west doctrines as laid out in the social doctrine of multiculturalism. The worse thing is to be tagged a racist for standing up against the elite's chosen race haters - like Muslims.
She seems to suffer from terminal PC-ness. She is shocked that believers in a religion think non-believers are on the path to a bad eternity? I guess she is one of those western non-believers who expect everyone else in the world will live and let live. She probably thinks/thought all the bad in the world comes/came from the west.
Maybe this is the solution for people like her to one at a time wake up and smell the coffee? But in the end, she had nothing to offer did she? She had no call to Christianity. No call to defend Britain. All she had was her offense at the marchers to no point.
That's the weakness. Western libs try being "non-judgemental", "fair" etc, and they act all surprised when confronted with people WHO HAVE NO INTEREST IN BEING FAIR by Western standards. Being "fair" means that you are WEAK and PREY in their eyes.
Placemark.
This was one that boasted of fundraising for Ayatollah Khameneis organisation. Ayatollah Khamenei is the worlds foremost terror financier the supremo of Iran, a wanted human rights criminal in the Hague, the controller of Hizballah, implicated in the execution of a Lebanese head of state, the controller of the Iranian Gestapo (the basij), and the man who maintains the death contract on Salman Rushdie.
The Council say the decision not to sell the land cheaply to this mosque organisation was as a result of a Council meeting in December. But that is wrong. It was as a result of a very angry public meeting on 24th March 2011 where the Council didnt cover themselves in glory.
I have never been at meeting so violent in tone. The mosque followers were flash-mobbing, half the room was shouting, and I had to have a police escort out at the end. Saying rude things about a wanted human rights criminal (Khamenei) can make you the most hated man in the room.
This was a fishy proposal from the start.
First, why not use the land for housing? Council Policy says the land should be used for predominantly residential and commercial uses:
The town is clearly facing severe problems in terms of meeting the housing needs of local people Particular problems facing the town include
high levels of demand for housing, particularly social housing,But someone in the Council theyre not saying who offered this prime development site to the Masjid E-Ali mosque organisation for £1.5 million.severe shortage and high cost of suitable building land within the town
Why? And what investigation would the Council do about it? When I asked these questions, the Council flannelled and stalled.
Second, Masjid E-Ali. As usual, they call the mosque a community centre for people of all communities, etc, etc. But Masjid means Mosque. Besides, theres a perfectly good community centre around the corner.
On their website, they boasted that they already had the contract to purchase the site from the Council, for £1.5m.
They also boast that two senior Ayatulluhs, Ayatullah Sistani of Iraq, and Ayatullah Khamenei of Iran, have given them a certificate of permission (Khums Ijaaza) to raise funds for the mosque.
So who are these two Ayatullahs?
Ayatullah Sistani is a hardline Iraqi cleric. He is on record as saying that gay people should be executed in the worst, most severe way. I hope Luton Council bears that in mind when it next celebrates Luton in Harmony day.
And its not just gays hes got it in for. He doesnt like kafirs much either. According to him, Kafir are No 8 of the 10 essentially unclean things. We rank below 1. Urine, 2. Faeces, 3. Semen, 4. Dead body, 5. Blood, 6. Dog, and 7. Pig. But above 9. Alcoholic liquors, and 10. The sweat of an animal who persistently eats najasat. Put simply, you and I are worse than shit according to one of the men this mosque outfit have gone to for endorsement.
The other Ayatullah is Ayatullah Khamenei, the organ-grinder to Ahmedinejad.
It gets worse. According to their website, the mosque have promised to give 50% of what they raise to the organisation of Ayatollah Sistani and 50% to the organisation of Ayatollah Khamenei. So thats 50% to the mosque, 50% to Sistani, and 50% to Khamenei, but maths isnt my strong point.
This mosque is obliged to send half its receipts to the top banana of a hostile and dangerous enemy.
So what steps will the Council now take to investigate a mosque organisation committed to handing funds to an organisation controlled by the man who has paid for so many British servicemens deaths? I asked them that at the meeting on 24th March 2011, but got no answer to that one either.
This is a former military site the Drill Hall? A mosque is isnt just a place of prayer and reflection like a church. Every mosque is modelled on the original mosque in Medina, where death sentences were passed, domestic and military policy instituted, wars planned, arms stored, soldiers trained, and troops dispatched to conquer Arabia.
And the tradition continues: Finsbury Park Mosque, the Munich mosque, many more in Iraq and Afghanistan all have stored arms.
Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey put it right: The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers
But the good news is that this one has been stopped. It can be done.
One of the things we have going for us here in the U.S. is that our country is a lot bigger. England can be taken over a lot easier. Sad because I have a lot of kin folks not too far removed that are over there.
Thanks for posting the full video. She hasn’t learned. She still thinks they can coexist if they just talk things out. The EDL guy knows different.
Her: “But he’s not imposing it (Sharia Law) on anyone!”
EDL Guy: “But he will when there’s enough of them!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.