We are not talking about what Gingrich thinks on gay marriage, bestiality, polygamy, abortion, incest, or polyamorous relations.
As the article begins “in a break with Santorum and Romney...” he now thinks there is a “right way” to legalize this rot. Those of us who still believe that our rights fro our Creator reject this.
So stop the spin, stop trying to accuse the bearer of the news, and if you have any complaints write to the authors of the article. But stop hurling invective and false accusations. Either that, or have the courage and integrity to speak up and admit that Gingrich misspoke or he was wrong, absolutely wrong, in this muddled0-headed way of trying to validate an evil.
No it does not.
The article begins: In a break with Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich declined to outright attack a new law that allows gay marriage in this state, suggesting he is OK with states legalizing gay marriage through popular vote.
There is no mention of Romney.
Gingrich states explicitly that he is not for gay marriage. Your your point in this whole exchange has been to suggest that his language "right way" implies that he is. So, yes, that is what we're talking about.
Further, you can not claim to be "just the messenger" when you're intention is clearly to MISREPRESENT his position on the topic