Does not compute in American law.
You just can not understand that the police and the Indiana Supreme Court got the decision wrong. Even the court said he was moving out, not that he had moced out.
American law supports my view point. See
United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 594 (1948)
I'm pointing to the notion you have that if someone hasn't been sued he didn't cause damage or violate rights.
Nothing in the record shows you point of view. How did he violate her rights?