Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ratman83
BTW, your argument is right out of Sharia Law ~ I'm pointing to the notion you have that if someone hasn't been sued he didn't cause damage or violate rights.

Does not compute in American law.

79 posted on 02/29/2012 5:13:30 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
your argument is right out of Sharia Law BS neverything I have said is US based.

You just can not understand that the police and the Indiana Supreme Court got the decision wrong. Even the court said he was moving out, not that he had moced out.

American law supports my view point. See

United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 594 (1948)

I'm pointing to the notion you have that if someone hasn't been sued he didn't cause damage or violate rights.

Nothing in the record shows you point of view. How did he violate her rights?

80 posted on 02/29/2012 5:39:20 AM PST by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson