Replies

The earlier posts about Palin, were quick and fairly innocuous. Jeff Head mentioned her in his post, and I mentioned her back (from the posted article) to him. Neither of us made her the center of the thread.

Oh please, I was born at night, but not LAST night! You may not have made Sarah the 'center' of the thread and there was no need to, because you (and other posters) weaved her into nearly the entire BODY of the thread! Who do you think you're fooling with that nonsense?!? LOL

The two of you took it to a whole new level, and yes you did hijack the thread, making it about some old grudge you both hold concerning Sarah Palin.

Perhaps it is because we were not fawning over Sarah as you (and other posters) do by default?

I really don't care to keep this up, doubt I will respond if you do, but you need to reconsider what you did, and try to keep it a bit lighter if you would. Sarah Palin is hardly the enemy of conservatism, the kind of animosity you hold might be better reserved for some genuine enemy of our way of life.

Who said I viewed her as an enemy? Read back and you will see that I have clearly stated that I agree with MANY of the things that Sarah has said and done, and I have no animosity towards her, but I (unlike you it seems) am not about to give her or ANY public figure claiming to be a conservative an automatic pass and a rubber stamp for anything they say and do. And I do believe you ARE smarter than that.

Fwiw, I think you are being heavily bested by the poster you are so heatedly debating, keeping this thread alive with your posts.

You should be thanking me for keeping the thread alive, that's more attention to the article you posted, right?

Show some gratitude you ingrate. lol

‘am not about to give her or ANY public figure claiming to be a conservative an automatic pass and a rubber stamp for anything they say and do.’

I have asked you this upthread and you have still not answered.

What did Sarah Palin say in her FB post that you object to?