Posted on 02/23/2012 10:35:04 AM PST by VU4G10
Mitt Romney leads President Obama by 4 percentage points in Gallup’s latest national head-to-head polling.
If the election were held Thursday, 50 percent said they would support Romney, versus 46 percent who would support Obama, according to Gallup. The president holds the edge on former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), 49 percent to 48 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Oh good VG. At first I thought you meant that by being butter on Mr. Toast, you went all Ann Coulter on us. LOL
“This is why we have to have a NOT-ROMNEY at the top of the ticket if we are to have any hope of digging America out of this hole we’re in.”
Freeper Alert: (Picture Drudge like sirens flashing)
You all need to bookmark Victory gal’s post, print it out and tape it to your bathroom mirrors!
This is the real issue. ROMNEY IS OUR ENEMY AND NEEDS TO BE DEFEATED. Don’t just sit there. Volunteer, contribute, do whatever you can to make that happen.
Call, text or email your family and misinformed Az and Mich. friends with sound reasoning as to why they shouldn’t vote for Mittens next Tuesday.
Finally, I recommend that you ditch Faux news for a while in lieu of reading, watching Downton Abbey reruns or grooming your dog...if you would like for the top half of your head to remain where it now is now rather than end up on the ceiling like mine almost did the morning after the debates.
Don't forget my hell hole state of Illinois, the communist state that gave the rest of the country this tyrant!!!
Why would you think that if Romney gets in and starts enacting liberal policies? If Bush could manage to give Democrats control of congress, it will be all the more easier for someone much more liberal to do so.
So, you thought Bush 41's nomination of David Souter was better than Clinton or Obama's nominees? Why?
Romney packed the courts with liberals in Massachusetts. Why would you trust him to nominate judges to SCOTUS?
Republicans have a lot more of a backbone when opposing liberal policies from a Democrat than they do when it comes to opposing them from a RINO.
I'll gridlock over Romney working with the McCains of the world to pass liberal legislation.
There’s a 100% chance that Obama would nominated a crazy liberal to the USSC.
There’s less than 100% chance that any republican would do tgat.
Even 99% is better than 100%.
you obviously didn’t read my entire post, or you wouldn’t have asked the question you asked.
At least, he'd only be doing it for four years while Kennedy and the four conservatives justices remain on the court.
Eight years of Romney and/or another Democrat nominating judges and we might not see a conservative majority on SCOTUS for a generation.
Obviously, you didn't read mine or you'd explain why you'd trust Romney to nominate judges to SCOTUS when he went out of his way to appoint liberal judges to courts in Massachusetts.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html
And in their national poll of the candidates, they are already showing Santorum slipping, which indicates a trend. RCP’s polling usually has about a week lag behind the more active current polls.
But the trend does not look good for the Reverend.
I did explain by way of the history of Republican vs. Democrat presidencies. You’ve not refuted or given any evidence to the contrary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.