Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK
I don't have a problem with generic "remarks" on space exploration". I have a problem with a very specific promise of a very specific event -- a permanent lunar colony -- occuring by a specific date.

Either 1) it's an empty promise because he can't guarantee that private enterprise will put up the hundreds of billions necessary, and complete it in that time frame, or 2) it's a promise he is going to ensure is fulfilled via hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Those are the only two options, and neither is something I want to hear from the candidate I support.

82 posted on 02/24/2012 7:43:53 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

THere aren’t hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and Newt very well knows that.

He isn’t willing to borrow from China for that...he understands that China is a potential threat.

China believes in space warfare, therefore I see Newt as wanting to counter that. As of now we have nothing.

The idea in general of continuing in space exploration and activity is good, even essential, in this dangerous world.

The specifics can be tweaked.

I will await further reveals from Newt before condemning it and him.

Because even if he turned out to be wrong on this, he is still by far the best candidate.


83 posted on 02/26/2012 12:05:44 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson