Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

I read that entire case CDR and you are still wrong! No where did it say that natural born is other than born with both parents citizens at the time of that birth.


71 posted on 02/23/2012 8:51:38 PM PST by W. W. SMITH (Obama is Romney lite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: W. W. SMITH; Mr Rogers
I read that entire case CDR and you are still wrong!

Did you find that Wong Kim Ark was, at his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and was not ruled to be a natural born citizen?

72 posted on 02/23/2012 8:58:20 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: W. W. SMITH

“No where did it say that natural born is other than born with both parents citizens at the time of that birth.”

Then you need to reread it. Every state & every court says it is there. The dissent to WKA says it is there. Every member of Congress says it is there.

To every court & every state, it says NBS = NBC = 14th Amendment. The formal, one sentence ruling does not, just as the formal ruling in Minor makes no mention of NBC. But the argument made - the dicta, which is the same stuff folks waive around with Minor - says NBS = NBC.

I can’t make anyone ‘see’ it. But if all the world says your ‘facts’ are not true, who is right? If someone claims to be Emperor of the World and no one believes him, how many orders get obeyed?


87 posted on 02/24/2012 3:30:46 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson