Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

“My POINT was that sometimes they used NBC and sometimes they used NBS”

Which of course raises the question. When they read the Constitution for the first time, how would the Massachusetts’ legislators have interpeted the phrase “natural born Citizen”?


307 posted on 02/25/2012 8:05:12 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

Since they considered them interchangeable terms, they would have believed the meanings to be the same, only applied to US citizens instead of English subjects. That was the point of the WKA review.


308 posted on 02/25/2012 8:11:00 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: 4Zoltan

Many being lawyers they would have been very familiar with the common law phrase “natural born”. They understood that they were citizens instead of subjects due to the change in system of government.

The point is they wrote the Constitution using the legal phrases they were familiar with. The entire document is full of phrases from British common law.


309 posted on 02/25/2012 8:13:44 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson