[Harlan1196]

The wise fisherman does not boast of his prowess until he has a couple of fish on his stringer.

I can understand believing in your arguments. It’s this absolute certainty that yours is the only true answer I question. Custer was the epitome of absolute certainty and look where it got him. Just like Custer, you might be better served with some humility and some honest introspection.

With legal defeat after legal defeat, “it has nothing to do with us and our legal arguments.” rings hollow.

[philman_36]

Just like Custer, you might be better served with some humility and some honest introspection.
Perhaps you should follow your own advice.

It is simply more unsubstantiated birthers blather that will go absolutely nowhere in court.
It’s just a bunch of birthers making stuff up again.

[DiogenesLamp]

The wise fisherman does not boast of his prowess until he has a couple of fish on his stringer.

The wise fisherman does not equate the existence of fish with his ability to catch them.

That no court ever bothers to hear a case means that no ruling of any such court can ever be regarded as legitimate.

You must HEAR a case, before you can decide it's nonsense. Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying loudly "I'm not LISTENING! I'm not LISTENING! Is appropriate behavior for a child (or demcrats) but is not appropriate for a body of deliberative thought.

So far the children aren't listening. That does not make the children's opinion correct.