Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
So Justice Roberts was helpless to stop a crime? Not only that, he had no choice but to swear in a man he knew was not eligible?

This presumes that they have a correct understanding of the term "natural born citizen." It has been my observation that anyone trained in law worships at the alter of "precedent" rather than "original Intent." It is a disease that has spread throughout our legal system, and Justice Roberts may very well be a victim of it.

What you are saying is that Roberts, Scalia and Thomas have no honor. That they would knowingly violate their oaths to protect the Constitution.

Were such one dimensional thinkers not so loud and persistent, it wouldn't be worth the time to deal with you. I have presented an obvious alternative explanation. Of course, for someone that cannot keep two ideas in his head at the same time, this is most likely futile.

Perhaps pictures will help? You can understand pictures, right?


156 posted on 02/24/2012 10:32:34 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

So you are in the “Roberts and Scalia are ignorant of the law” camp.

Do you think Leo has a better understanding of the issue then they do?


157 posted on 02/24/2012 10:35:31 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson