[PSYCHO-FREEP]

As I recall you spent a great deal of time on the Gingrich threads when Newt was in the lead, with a list of why you could not support him. And you know full well I am a devoted Gingrich supporter. I don't blow with the wind as easily as some here.

Exposing impostors like Santorum is not “deep seeded hatred”. It is known as properly vetting a candidate, which in Santorum’s case is long past overdue.

[Lazlo in PA]

As I recall you spent a great deal of time on the Gingrich threads when Newt was in the lead...

That is not true. You know why I know? Because if you don't recall, people critical of Newt here at that time were Zotted. All Santorum people kept their mouth shut and went with the flow.

You call Santorum an imposter. What makes his record worse that Newt? Santorum's beliefs and voting record has long been vetted. That is why Milt isn't able to destroy him in MI with his barrage of negative adds like Newt was hurt. You are wishing that people will jump on your "No social issues" bandwagon. It isn't happening is it. Rick is actually hitting a pocket of disaffected voters who have been waiting for this debate and fight.