Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123

Actually, he does...and quite a few of them. Recently, as he has been dropping in the polls, they have begun to dry up, but he still has them all over the country.

I expect, at any rate, that money will not be the issue for Mr. Romney. It will remain to be his past positions on the issues and his inability to effectively articulate how he came to the current positions that he is now espousing and wants us to get behind him on. Santorum has a much better record on the same issues, as does Newt...though each has their own baggage to one extent or another.

Rightn now, I am supporting Santorum, and then Newt.

If Romney somehow became the nominee, I would vote for him in order to defeat Obama. But that would be the condition upon which my vote for him would hinge.

As it is, in our Idaho caucus, I will be promoting and voting for Santorum...unless something happens between now and then and Newt rises again and is the best positioned to get the nomination.


31 posted on 02/22/2012 8:43:48 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

Please tell us all why you favor Santorum. Is it that he’s the best anti-Romney we have at the moment? When you look at Santorum’s record, it’s anything but conservative. I think he’s probably better than Romney, but that may be a difference without a clear distinction. Then there’s Ron Paul, who, for all his years in Congress hasn’t passed anything. Sure, he’s a principled man, but he has done nothing to advance this country. He’s just a gadfly.


32 posted on 02/22/2012 8:54:38 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson