Posted on 02/21/2012 9:13:19 PM PST by mnehring
Presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said on Sunday that opponent Mitt Romney has the best “management style” out of all of his remaining Republican contest rivals....
...“I think he certainly would have a more acceptable management style when you consider what I have seen and experienced from the other two candidates. I don’t think they qualify there...
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Smallpox, an infectious disease unique to humans, caused by either of two virus variants, Variola major and Variola minor
Obama = Variola major
Romney = Variola minor
Both viruses cause small pox. You end up sick, sick, sick.
(You don’t know anything about Mittens if you consider him chicken pox.)
I am going on the assumption that you don’t know Romney at all. Take a look a my tagline. See Romney’s positions on the front page. Get to know what real conservatives think of the lying sack of crap that is Mitt Romney, fake conservative. If he is still acceptable to you, there is no hope for you.
I’ll say it again. I support whomever can beat Obama.
It is my belief that neither Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich can.
Which is why I’m voting for a brokered convention.
It’s pretty simple, mate.
In any case,Lincoln had no management style worth speaking of, but he learned how to run a war by sheer application and by trial and error. I have not seen much application by our current president. He is obviously a lazy man.
All those who support Paul must be on drugs.
Most of the Paul supporters I've met are druggies, and they'll make deviant sexual advances against your wife, kids, pets, and livestock, if they get half a chance.
Probably the same for Romney supporters, but I've never let them get that close.
Where do I and my overtook of knee pads.....?????
Make the case for your guy.
V
“Rinos aren’t great but they are way better than Obama. Period.”
RINOs like Bush I, BushII, Dole, McCain etc. pave the way to the Obamas of the world. They make socialism more palatable by easing us into it and putting a partial GOP-seal on the movement toward it.
They muddy the waters, confuse the issue and weaken our opposition to what’s happening on our side. By being on “our side” where much less likely to criticize them for doing the same exact things Obama does. That makes RINOs in some ways more dangerous — because they drain our resolve for true reform.
What would help is a clear alternative and maybe a crisis that forces us to adopt the painful post-Communist-style reforms that are necessary. See Chile and Poland. RINOs will not get us there. In fact, they’ll help lead us in the opposite direction.
Under these circumstances, it might be best for Obama to win the election, further wreck the economy and make the options between socialism/fascism and free-markets a lot more clear to the electorate than they appear to be now.
America’s finished if Obama gets a second term, if not the entire world.
If ROMNEY is on the GOP picket, ALL GOP CANDIDATES WILL LOSE.
I am amused that Paul is so in love with Romney, but frauds do stick together apparently.
If true, that is revealing - and disturbing.
Oh don’t get my last post wrong, I completely agree with you.
It’s a matter of what kind of delegate coalition shows up at the convention.
If Romney can offer Rand Paul the VP slot as a means of securing the 100 or so whacko Paulbot delegates, he’ll do it. Because to Romney, it’s not about winning, it’s about securing the nomination that he feels is rightfully his turn.
Santorum needs to come to the convention with about 1,000 delegates and a backing of a 3rd of the Superdelegates. Given the make-up of the primaries, this is certainly doable. But it will be close if these contests stay close.
I think RP prefers Myth to the other two due to the fierce interventionist posture from the mighty podium warriors Newt and Santorum. That’s all I got.
I think I know the strange alliance that has developed between Ron Paul (and his supporters) and Romney (and his supporters).
It’s all about worldview:
They BOTH hate conservatives (and more specifically) they both HATE the Christian ideology which conservatism rests upon. They’re both secular based (despite the protestations otherwise) and really do not like the Judeo/Christian worldview (and those things we support via government) so it’s a perfect match.. (two sides of the “establishment”). My take. -J.S.
who died and left you King?
Speak for yourself oh masterful one!
The Romney-Paul alliance is out in the open now I guess.
If you want to know how crazy Paul supporters are, just wiki “Paulville”. As a matter of fact, that wiki entry could become a legendary thread on FR I would think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.