Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
I've read it many times.

Madison clearly stated that Congress had the ability to define Citizenship.
I agree that Congress has the ability to define Citizenship when it pertains to naturalization.

Where does Madison specifically say Congress has the ability, or the authority, to define a natural born citizen?

148 posted on 02/22/2012 11:26:08 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

Well, Congress HAS done so.

It is water under the bridge.

Congress has an absolute right and duty to interpret, enact and enforce the Constitution.

In order for Congress to make laws concerning Naturalization, Congress FIRST had to decide who was, automatically, a Citizen from the moment of birth.


149 posted on 02/22/2012 11:29:46 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
Where does Madison specifically say Congress has the ability, or the authority, to define a natural born citizen?

Congress does not. If a kid is entitled to citizenship by birth, he's natural born. Period.

Due to the Fourteenth, Congress's authority only applies to babies born abroad (and to naturalization).

At the time Obama was born, the Fourteenth was in effect. Therefore, if he was born in Honolulu, he's natural born. However, if he was born in Mombasa (or Canada, or wherever), then his status is up to Congress (the Congress at the time, that is). If his momma was legally married to BHO, Sr., then he's not eligible, due to an obscure age requirement. However, she could not have been so married, since BHO, Sr, was already married, and the US does not recognize bigamous marriage. Therefore, she would indeed have been able to pass on citizenship to her little bastard. Thus, Zero skates, even if not born in the US! LOL!

151 posted on 02/22/2012 11:40:31 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
“Where does Madison specifically say Congress has the ability, or the authority, to define a natural born citizen?”

The case in question, that Madison speaks of, is CLEARLY, even by wacko bither standards, a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Yet? Madison still tells Congress that more legislation concerning Citizenship rules, would be helpful.

Congress DOES have the right and duty to interpret, enact and enforce the Constitution.

The opinions of Congress, On Constitutional matters, are EVERY BIT as important as the opinions of the Courts.

Even more so, in situations were the Constitution CLEARLY grants the the authority to the States, the Electors, and Congress, in Presidential elections!

Congress has spoken.

The Courts will NOT reverse Congress, on these matters.

174 posted on 02/23/2012 11:32:39 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson