To: Dr. Sivana
I don’t “like” any of them. As of now, I’d have to go with Newt since we really have not had any “quality” candidates in the race to choose from since this thing started. I’m talking someone like Sarah Palin, Jim DeMint or Paul Ryan. And I know he’s a Jr. Senator, but hell, Marco Rubio is head and shoulders above the 76 y.o. Kook-Daddy and The Three Stooges we have to choose from now. And as far as your boy, Rick Santorum: Someone needs to tell him that in his daily Bible Reading, he might want to check out James 1:19; “....be swift to hear and slow to speak....”
53 posted on
02/22/2012 3:45:43 AM PST by
no dems
(Rick Santorum is so out of touch with the real world. He needs to learn when to shut up.)
To: no dems; All
Sorry for the multiple posts of the same comment, everyone. Site Server was messing up. My apologies.
no dems
54 posted on
02/22/2012 3:47:57 AM PST by
no dems
(Rick Santorum is so out of touch with the real world. He needs to learn when to shut up.)
To: no dems
I dont like any of them. As of now, Id have to go with Newt since we really have not had any quality candidates in the race to choose from since this thing started.
I understand. Since, Newt is not competitive in MI, the best thing to do in your case is to promote Newt, not bash Santorum until Romney is embarrassed into leaving the race (after MI?). Two things could happen then, Newt will pick up a swath of Romney support, and the Establishment boys might be looking to force a Romney-less open convention,in which case the quality candidates you mentioned might be put into play.
56 posted on
02/22/2012 6:41:39 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson