[editor-surveyor]

You’re using your standard lying strawman debating techniques.

I didn’t say that Fleisher endorsed anybody. He said that Romney was fading, and Santorum was rising, and that Romney wasn’t likely to succeed.

That is a total abandonment of the position that Romney was the likely, sensible candidate.

Take your meds.

[Engraved-on-His-hands]

I didn’t say that Fleisher endorsed anybody.

I realize that I shouldn't waste time responding to some folks, but I'll do it this once:

No, you didn't specifically say that Fleischer endorsed anybody. However, your statement that "Fleisher blew Santorum’s last shred of cover by turning his way." would be interpreted by most folks that way.

Whether you said that Fleischer endorsed anyone or not, you said something far more earthshaking. You said that "Ari Fleisher has let the cat out of the bag, that the GOP establishment is switching to Santorum..."

With regard to what you said, that's kind of a bait and switch; or, as some might say, "standard lying strawman debating techniques".

There are a lot of good-hearted, sincere Newt supporters. I think that the ones that I know would be embarrassed by your posts.

You're not accomplishing anything for your candidate. Is it perhaps that you know that your guy is losing, you can't accept it, and in your bitterness you are determined to leave a scorched earth behind you?

[ohioWfan]

You’re using your standard lying strawman debating techniques.

Again, a silly and bogus ad hominem. The only one not telling the truth is you, dear ed, so cut the personal attacks and defend this ridiculous statement....

Now that Ari Fleisher has let the cat out of the bag, that the GOP establishment is switching to Santorum, things are going to get interesting.

Of course, since it's BUNK, you can't, so I will wait with baited breath for your next dopey personal attack on me, and evasion of the fact that your first post was completely untrue.

(Whoever said it upthread is right on target. With 'friends' like you, Newt needs no enemies).

[ohioWfan]

I didn’t say that Fleisher endorsed anybody. He said that Romney was fading, and Santorum was rising, and that Romney wasn’t likely to succeed.

That is a total abandonment of the position that Romney was the likely, sensible candidate.

Incidentally, your conclusions and evasions in this post are equally bunk.

If you're capable of rational discussion (not sure from what I see here), I will add to the comments of Mike DeWine (whom I cannot stand, btw), that here in Ohio, observing what he is seeing on the ground, the enthusiasm is for Santorum.

Mikey is fully establishment, he was not endorsing any more than Ari, but was observing that the conservative voters.....yes, the CONSERVATIVE voters........are enthused about Santorum.

You'll have to deal with that, ed. Because it's true.

[ohioWfan]

Take your meds.

Oh yeah.......and if you're going to be personally insulting, you should at least try to be creative.

This is really a stupid attack. It makes you look like a complete dope.

Just for the record. :)