yes... God forbid we should have any actual discussion around here. We have to make sure we have nothing but an echo chamber. No sense actually staking out a position and defending it with persuasive argument.
I didn’t agree with bvw’s comment, but i was intrigued enough to want to challenge it and find out what he (?) meant by it. I don’t think it’s fair to claim that bvw was pro-abort. I would’ve liked to find out a little more and it would’ve been interesting to see him defend that statement.
oh, well.
The woman’s lapse into insanity may be temporary, but killing the child would put an end to it forever. And as it apparently has come out, Ms. Moe had actually expressed the wish after her first abortion that she wouldn’t repeat it. That ought to close the case if nothing else does. This judge ought to be recalled, barfed out, impeached, and anything more along those lines. While I do not see any biblically based call for banning marijuana any more than banning wine, it is certainly possible to indulge to the point of silliness. I wonder if that’s what happened (only half kidding).
“yes... God forbid we should have any actual discussion around here.”
This is a private website and the owner can ban anyone he wants for any reason or no reason. That said, I’ve become opposed to the idea of the zot of late. In this case, I was fine with it. But in the case of the run of the mill rudybot or romneybot...so what’s the harm? Even a blind squirrel can find a nut every now and then. And in any case it just forces those who really want to post to do so under the radar.
A witchhunt isn’t any fun without witches.