Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew

Perhaps then we should have an amendment to limit government spending to remain at or below a certain percentage of the GDP. Any revenue taken in that goes above that amount due to fluctuations in the economy should either be returned to the taxpayer or put in a rainy day fund for when revenues received do not meet the funding requirements.


110 posted on 02/19/2012 10:02:31 PM PST by JediJones (Just say NO to the MittRick system! Disenfranchise the establishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
Perhaps then we should have an amendment to limit government spending to remain at or below a certain percentage of the GDP. Any revenue taken in that goes above that amount due to fluctuations in the economy should either be returned to the taxpayer or put in a rainy day fund for when revenues received do not meet the funding requirements.

Now you're talking. The Leftists, who would love to pass a "balanced budget amendment", would run the other way on a SPENDING LIMITATION AMENDMENT.

Can you imagine any Dem voting for that? He's probably get kicked out of the Party. Be hard to get the votes for that.

124 posted on 02/20/2012 3:29:04 AM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson