Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BarnacleCenturion

Not against women in the military at all in fact I proudly serve with some awesome ones. Seem unnecessary to allow this as our tool of a president wants to cut 78,000 active duty position just for starters in the next 3 years.


10 posted on 02/18/2012 7:40:16 AM PST by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, Where's your brothers El Camino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Newbomb Turk

“Seem unnecessary to allow this as our tool of a president wants to cut 78,000 active duty position just for starters in the next 3 years.”

Actually, I think this is the exact reason why it has to be done. Allowing women to serve was originally a “feel-good” social program. But now that the Army is going to be meat-axed to a fraction of the troops necessary for a hot war, they can’t afford to have a large number of people wearing the uniform that can’t be sent into combat.


76 posted on 02/18/2012 3:06:43 PM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson