Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patton@Bastogne; onyx; b9; true believer forever; KansasGirl; TitansAFC; caww; All

I hope you are fully aware of Santorum’s vicious attacks against Newt, while Newt has never attacked him.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/santorum-campaign-launches-gingrich-radio-attack-ad/

Jan 31, 2012

“The Santorum campaign is out with a new radio ad attacking Newt Gingrich, ABC News has learned.

The negative ad says Gingrich is not a “true conservative” and that is why he lost Tuesday evening to Mitt Romney in the Florida primary.

“The Florida results are in, and despite spending millions, Newt Gingrich went from a big lead to a big defeat. Why? Because voters discovered Gingrich wasn’t a true conservative,” the voice over reads.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/pro-santorum-super-pac-ad-takes-first-negative-shot-at-gingrich-romney/

February 3, 2012

“Pro-Santorum Super PAC Ad Takes First Negative Shot at Gingrich

The Red, White and Blue Fund’s latest television commercial, called “The Only One,” will air in the Minneapolis market comparing Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich to President Obama. The state’s caucuses are Feb. 7.

The 30-second spot shows images of Obama, Romney and Gingrich while the announcer says, “They’re not so different.””

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-santorum-attack-gingrich-half-trillion-dollar-lunar-221400819.html

February 3, 2012

“Santorum’s ad, which is running on satellite radio, according to the Hill newspaper, states that, “Reckless spending has led to $15 trillion of national debt. And what does Newt Gingrich suggest? Spending half a trillion dollars on a moon colony.” The ad goes on to provide a quote of Gingrich proposing the lunar base. Then it describes the idea as “fiscal insanity.””

It will be a chilly day in hell, when Gingrich chooses Santorum as VP


47 posted on 02/19/2012 11:40:40 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: All

Santorum’s ad:”“Reckless spending has led to $15 trillion of national debt. And what does Newt Gingrich suggest? Spending half a trillion dollars ($500 billion) on a moon colony.”

FACTCHECK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFdr81Uttgg

Gingrich did not give a cost analysis of his lunar base proposal. The only figure he has given was $5 billion out of the actual NASA budget, as prize to be given to the first private group to establish a lunar base.

The Constellation program, which would have involved a human return to the moon by 2020, a lunar base thereafter, and eventually expeditions to Mars and to Earth approaching asteroids was estimated by NASA, according to a General Accounting Office report, to cost $97 billion through 2020. However the report suggested that NASA did not actually know how much Constellation would have ultimately cost. The GAO made some recommendations for NASA to refine the Constellation program to arrive at a more accurate cost estimate.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies suggested that the cost of a lunar base would be $35 billion under the Constellation program, including the development of the Altair lander, lunar habitation modules, and the costs of two Ares V launches to deploy the base. Operation costs of the base, which would have four people, would be just over $7 billion a year, to be shared by international partners.

Atlanta, GA — Newt 2012 National Security Advisor Stephen Yates shared the following statement in response to Senator Rick Santorum’s criticism of Newt Gingrich’s American space policy:

“I am deeply concerned that Senator Santorum so easily relinquishes space development to the Chinese and Russians.

“American success in space is not only about being the first to develop a station on the moon. It is just as much about the explosion of math, science, engineering and national security technology that will launch America into a new age of innovation and prosperity.

“We owe it to ourselves to set grandiose goals and then achieve them. It is the American way.”


51 posted on 02/19/2012 12:23:38 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Marguerite
.


It will be a chilly day in hell, when Gingrich chooses Santorum as VP

Newt's a smart guy, then ...


I didn't post that Newt "should" pick Ricky Santorum as VP ... only that Ricky would be "lucky" to have the opportunity to be tutored by Newt Gingrich ...

Of course, all the empirical evidence points to that Santorum has always been "designed" as Romney's "Stalking Horse" candidate to damage Newt from the very beginning ...




I can't wait to see the expressions on the faces of these two losers when the Tampa GOP Convention erupts in "massive applause" (visible from space) ...

when Newt and Sarah take the podium (together) to begin the "real 2012 campaign" against The Kenyan ...



.
59 posted on 02/19/2012 2:48:05 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Marguerite
Looks like Santorum is pushing Romney points in his adds. Still, I wouldn't have expected Santorum to knock on Newt as he's doing unless he's become Romneys "boy"...which looks now to be the case. Santorum will do whatever it takes to secure his own political ambitions. He's done this before in PA. and he's all about whatever win he can slip under his own belt and that has priority over everything else including this country.
64 posted on 02/19/2012 5:54:04 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson