Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patton@Bastogne

And what would Michael Reagan know? He wasn’t a congressman during that time, he’s a talk show host who endorsed Gingrich — why would he mention Santorum? I mean, I guess it’s nice that Michael endorsed Newt, but I think it’s more important that Perry endorsed Newt.

And Michael Reagan has no more authority to claim who Ronald Reagan would have endorsed than you or I. We don’t inherent greatness.


36 posted on 02/19/2012 8:00:57 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

“And what would Michael Reagan know?”

Michael Reagan was 35-year-old when his father became president in 1980. So he well knows about EVERYTHING which happened during Reagan’s two term presidency.


41 posted on 02/19/2012 10:04:58 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
.


And Michael Reagan has no more authority to claim who Ronald Reagan would have endorsed than you or I. We don’t inherent greatness.


I respectfully disagree ...

My dad is 82 years old ... and (because I'm his son and know "him" and his "life" and "philosophy") ...

I "guarantee" that I can speak to anyone about "Charlie's" political preferences (A Democrat who despises Obama), radio station favorites (NPR), religious beliefs, Navy career (Sealab II-III), and equally important ... the guys that were his BEST friends ... and the guys he thought were idiots or pond scum ...

I bet you can speak "with authority" about your own father ...

Why should Michael Reagan be different ?



=====================================


And what would Michael Reagan know?


Probably "almost" everything ... things he's at liberty to discuss ... and things that are family secrets or other's successes or failures ...



=====================================


Honestly, and again, (genuinely) with all due respect ...


Rick Santorum is "indeed" a former multi-term Congressman, with some positive points as a American (Ronald Reagan) Conservative ...

No one with a knowledge of history can truthfully refute that "fact" ...

Just as no one can truthfully refute that "Patton@Bastogne" is a succesfull Aerospace Mechanical Engineer ...

However, "Patton@Bastogne" is NOT Einsten, Werner Von Braun,or the Texas Instrument engineer who invented the Integrated Circiut ...

And ... Ergo ... as acommplished as he is ... Rick Santorum's political accomplishments are a Sand Speck compared to Newt Gingrich ...


Newt Gingrich's political accomplishments literally "changed the course" of American History ... in the same vein as Ronald Reagan, Bush-43 (Post-911), and Winston Churchill in pre-WWII Great Britian ...

And that's a fact ...



=====================================


"So what then do we say about Rick Santorum ?" ...

... echoing the Apostle Paul's question to the Christian Church in Romans ...


Rick Santorum would make a GREAT Vice President ... under the idelogical-political-legislative tutiledge (sp) of President Newt Gingrich.

Even Rick Santorum's recent "in-your-face" response to the Liberal Media (about Frieze) is COMMONLY SEEN as mimicing Newt Gingrich ...

Rick Santorum is "good" ... but Obama will DESTROY that fair-haired "boy" in the 2012 Presidential campaign ...



=====================================


Of course, all of this is academic ... because the GOP will nominate ... and America will elect ...

Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin at the 2012 Tampa Convention ...





.
43 posted on 02/19/2012 10:07:25 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson