To: Cincinatus' Wife
12 posted on
02/18/2012 2:24:19 AM PST by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
To: SatinDoll
To: SatinDoll
It could be true with those guys. If we knew more, we should get the word out to stop their plan, having an army to vote for Newt. While my sister was in Washington at CPAC, she said alot of people were saying Mitt and Rick would probably be the ticket, Mitt, pres. Rick Vp tho the stop Mitt vote has messed this up, shall we say for Mitt. so the RNC could calm all things down. She said Newt had strong support. They thought his low #’s seem fishy. Rick accused the Cpac vote as having a fraudulent outcome though, he dropped that assessment like a hot potato. Most places I read on twitter and facebook, are commonly saying Mitt and Rick will team up. I think Rick is moving way too fast before proper vetting.
16 posted on
02/18/2012 3:03:05 AM PST by
Christie at the beach
(I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
To: SatinDoll
I am WIDE awake this morning thanks to your threads. I am furious over that prospect. I had to update my tagline.
21 posted on
02/18/2012 4:29:20 AM PST by
SueRae
(Tale of 2 Towers - First, Isengaard (GOP-e), then 11.06.2012, the Tower of Sauron)
To: SatinDoll
I believe that Santorum was backed from the beginning as a strategic candidate who could garner votes from a segment of the base that would not go with Romney.
Santorum will dump his delegates on Romney. Nothing in his background suggests he would do anything different.
You think Romney and the GOP-e don't know about his percentages?
24 posted on
02/18/2012 6:13:11 AM PST by
GVnana
(Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson