To: hwkbeer
I have no cop connections at all.
I have stated my reasons for objecting to your unfair attack on a cop who is innocent until proven guilty.
You been challenged to support your claims, and you cannot.
You’ve been blowing smoke.
105 posted on
02/17/2012 9:03:39 PM PST by
donna
(I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
To: donna
I offered regrets for commenting on an article with scant info.You and I agree the media is not to be trusted yet you bait me to use the media to somehow prove a point of which the media,in my personal experience was not involved.I have stated over and over that I know of very good people serving as officers as well as bad apples that I'm sure sane people would agree is true.You've proved yourself to be just argumentative on this subject.
I refuse to argue with fence posts,so have a wonderful day.
109 posted on
02/18/2012 5:01:52 AM PST by
hwkbeer
To: donna
Hey, that's a legal presumption for purposes of a trial. Fact is the cop shot the man who was holding a baby. The cop admits it. The other cops admit it. Other witnesses saw it.
There is absolutely no doubt who shot the man.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson