Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DNA.2012
No women should be in combat, period. Why not? Do you have specific reasons other than simple tradition?

Yeah, it's called respect for females. Very, very few of them have the body strength of men, and as has been reported, they don't do too well in combat (I'm sure you don't agree) and the male fellow soldiers spend too much time worrying about the woman's safety rather than killing the enemy.

I feel sorry for you if you feel that women deserve an equal chance to be captured, raped, molested, and killed.

72 posted on 02/17/2012 12:36:44 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: laweeks
No need to throw insults: that's all people ever do in debating the issue, and it makes things superficial.

Very, very few of them have the body strength of men and they don't do too well in combat

Those could very well be valid points.

the male fellow soldiers spend too much time worrying about the woman's safety rather than killing the enemy.

That also could be a valid point.

Yeah, it's called respect for females.

There is the real motivation, or a partial expression of it, why many don't want women in combat.

So, why?

Respect for all women? The good women and the bad women equally?

On exactly what basis?

And on what basis are men alleged to merit less respect?

73 posted on 02/17/2012 3:25:04 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson