Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BarnacleCenturion

Sorry, tough lady, but if Santorum said that women should not be in dangerous situations in combat, then I wholly agree. The full story of Jessica Lynch has not been to well spread around. She was raped repeatedly by the muslim scum! But the feminazis tried to hide all that to pretend that nothing happened.

No women should be in combat, period. And certainly not as fighter pilots. My God! Don’t we have more respect for women than that?


5 posted on 02/17/2012 8:47:43 AM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: laweeks

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-11-06-lynch_x.htm

Yes, it is a gruesome story. Women DO NOT belong in combat.


8 posted on 02/17/2012 8:55:15 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks

Do you think men are immune to a little gang rape?

Think they are not going to do it because they condemn homosexuality?

Oh how little you know of their culture, for you see, it would be the VICTIM of the gang rape who was homosexual in their eyes - not the perpetrators of it.


11 posted on 02/17/2012 8:59:10 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks

The people in charge at the time didn’t want people to know the whole story either.


19 posted on 02/17/2012 9:09:49 AM PST by Terry Mross (Difference between a conservative / liberal-obvious. Difference between a rep and a dem? None)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks
if Santorum said that women should not be in dangerous situations in combat, then I wholly agree.

My f*ing word. FR is starting to sound like Ding-Dong School.

26 posted on 02/17/2012 9:35:43 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks

McSally is pretty much wrapped up in her own point of view alone, and in her one dimensional view of herself, as being both female and macho. She gives no place whatsoever to the man, or to the nature of man to defend a woman, or the natural burden a woman is to him on a battlefield, and certainly she discounts his opinion on the matter.

These selfish thinking feminists can NOT defy nature, which does the dictating here, whether McSally likes it, or not.

Why should the male soldier deserve the extra burden placed on his own human nature;that of defending some dang woman in the field, at the same time having to deal with the problems her presence can bring, nevermind her inferior physical strength. His natural inclination to defend her is in keeping with nature and can not be changed.

These women have made themselves god.


49 posted on 02/17/2012 10:35:07 AM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks

nope—I expectorate she don’t.She sounds like a John McCain kind of Republicrat.


68 posted on 02/17/2012 11:41:31 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks
No women should be in combat, period.

Why not?

Do you have specific reasons other than simple tradition?

70 posted on 02/17/2012 12:09:54 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: laweeks
Do you and "St." Santorum have so little respect for women you can't let them decide what risk to take upon themselves?

He lost 61% of the women's vote in his last election.

Even in his successful 2000 reelection he could only tie his Dem opponent.

74 posted on 02/17/2012 6:52:25 PM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum has baggage too! Demand an inspection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson