[Seizethecarp]

“I think you ought to realize by now that none of these court challenges is going to remove Obama from office or prevent him from running again. Judges have great discretionary powers, and they will use them.”

IMO, it is folly to presume to know how any court will rule.

Malihi’s ruling was pathetic on its face. He resorted to citing dicta from an Indiana state appeals court. I expect the Democrap jurists in Fulton Co. to at least pretend to rely directly on a SCOTUS ruling to affirm Barry's eligibility.

I find it extremely telling that between the Ankeny court and Malihi, NO SCOTUS precedent subsequent to WKA has been cited to affirm that Barry is NBC...because there isn't any such case. Even the Ankeny panel stated that the WKA court did NOT declare WKA to be NBC, contrary to Obot claims.

[sometime lurker]

NO SCOTUS precedent subsequent to WKA has been cited to affirm that Barry is NBC...because there isn't any such case.

Try Rogers v Bellei

We thus have an acknowledgment that our law in this area follows English concepts with an acceptance of the jus soli, that is, that the place of birth governs citizenship status except as modified by statute.

Jus soli means "born on the soil" (usual diplomatic etc. exceptions) = natural born.

[Jabba the Nutt]

I believe the Georgia Secretary of State has already stepped in to review this Judge’s ruling.