Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark
+1.

Yes, he was the go to “Conservative” for MSNBC. Not because he was an eloquent and effective spokesman for our cause - but to discredit us with his clumsy thinking and reflexive antisemitism.

41 posted on 02/17/2012 7:25:22 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

“Yes, he was the go to “Conservative” for MSNBC. Not because he was an eloquent and effective spokesman for our cause - but to discredit us with his clumsy thinking and reflexive antisemitism.”

I’m curious- are you old enough to have watched Buchanan versus Tom Braden on the original Crossfire? Or Buchanan versus Michael Kinsley?

I’m always curious to know just how much the Buchanan haters know about his history. Ronald Reagan certainly didn’t share your opinion of Pat Buchanan seeing as Reagan hired him as a speechwriter.

In fact the majority of Buchanan’s political opponents never even made the sort of charges I see routinely at this website. The first time I ever saw this sort of vitriol was in a Commentary article written by the former president of a socialist youth league.


61 posted on 02/20/2012 10:35:10 PM PST by Pelham (Vultures for Romney. We pluck your carcass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson