To: American Constitutionalist
What you may be missing is that most women aren’t going to think it’s funny or a joke, and most younger people are going to think it’s bizarre and unsettling.
This is not the 1950’s. We have to win with the electorate as it is today, which means not telling us about what Rick thinks is morale, whether people should practice birth control, or whether women should work.
Rick spells certain and landslide defeat if we nominiate him. Gingrich is light years better.
To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
" What you may be missing is that most women arent going to think its funny or a joke, and most younger people are going to think its bizarre and unsettling. "
Hey ? get a clue , people don't think it's funny or a joke of us having to pay for this by the government.
To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
" What you may be missing is that most women arent going to think its funny or a joke, and most younger people are going to think its bizarre and unsettling.
This is not the 1950s. We have to win with the electorate as it is today, which means not telling us about what Rick thinks is morale, whether people should practice birth control, or whether women should work.
Rick spells certain and landslide defeat if we nominate him. Gingrich is light years better. "
We are talking about " Conservative " values and virtues here..
If you are correct then, then ? Newt Gingrich has more appeal and values focused towards those on the left and those OCCUPIED Wall street loonies... let them vote for Newt, we are in the race to vote for a " Conservative " candidate here, not appealing to the left and Wall Street Occupiers.
To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
And what does this have to do with Rick Santorum? Is he responsible for jokes told by the guy who runs an independent SuperPac? Don’t vote for Foster for President if you think it’s a problem.
If I held Gingrich responsible for what some of his backers here said, he couldn’t win for dog catcher.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson